Be More Choosy With Your Titles, Sir
Submitted by: ledhendrix via Submission Page
« Previous This Explains Why Kratos Was Single | O RLY? Next »
« Previous This Explains Why Kratos Was Single | O RLY? Next »
Submitted by: ledhendrix via Submission Page
Reminds me of my French teacher’s dead baby jokes.
fail.
Be more careful with with your cropping. Hopeless!
WURST!
Win for being an attention grabber.
What am I missing? Is there something wrong with the cropping? Anyway, it’s okay…he just wants to snoot them.
I mean, it’s not very nice to behave haughtily toward innocent infants, but it could be worse.
…Um…ok.
Don’t snoot those babies!
This is so obviously a fake I can’t see how it passed moderation…
What sort of sick idiot would snoot a baby?
lol too true JY, too true.
Snoot doesn’t mean anything sexual the last I heard.
It means nose, a snob, or to treat someone “haughtily”. The fail here is trying to make something sound dirty that doesn’t.
Is it weird that you’re explaining how snoot isn’t sexual, yet no one else mentioned sex here?
I think it’s shoot-I’m a photographer and we say it all the time “I shoot children with cannons”-hilarious.
That’s what it is supposed to be, but the n is just below the h on the keyboard, so it’s just a typo.
A not so funny type to say the least.
“A not so funny type to say the least.”
^^ A typo just as funny as the post! OMGZ I R TEH INTARWEBZ MASTA
Obviously faked. The “wanted” isn’t corrected…
Upon second glance, it looks like someone cropped the picture, then replaced the l,f,b,i, and t’s, then didn’t fix the h. If someone did this on purpose to be funny… it’s the biggest fail ever.
Anyone wanna create a icanhaz fail/ win blog with me? Plenty of oppurtunities here.
or the rest of “wanted”… strange….
If you look at the post, the top half of “wanted” is taken off. So obviously, the person re-made the ascenders for some of the letters, but decided to make a fail by not making one for the h. You all fail for believing the photographer made a typo.
How is that a fail? We believe someone made a typo, which is MUCH more common, rather than stretch ourselves to believe that someone would go to such lengths for a completely crappy joke.
Dude, snoot doesn’t even mean anything sexual… ~yawn~
I’d rather believe it was a mistake rather than someone being THAT lame. (Even though I know better)
The fail is the cropper, plain and simple.
The fail is in the Loki, plain and simple.
The real fail is in baby shooting.
Snooting babies? … You sick bastard.
I’m pretty sure the reason it’s on here isn’t that it says “snoot.” The post was submitted because of the original, actual title of the post, “looking for babies to shoot.” We all know he wants to photograph the babies, but it’s funny because when you first read it, you think he wants to shoot them with a gun.
…Just in case anyone didn’t get that.
…Which you totally should have
Which we totally did. But snoot is far more fun to say.
A “snoot” is a piece of lighting equipment used in photography studios. But that doesn’t make this any clearer or funnier.
im pretty sure its supposed to say shoot, someone just cut off the top of the h…